[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Latest Athlon test results
"diff" of gcc 2.96-81 vs. gcc 3.0 SUMMARY.LOG: < is gcc 2.96-81, > is gcc
3.0
Atlas source is 3.3.1 for both
M. Edward Borasky, Borasky Research, 3 July 2001
Atlas options: 3DNow yes, all others defaults
Environment: 1.333 GHz Athlon Thunderbird, 512 MB DDR RAM
*Stock* Red Hat Linux 7.1 except for compiler
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
5c5
< * BEGAN ATLAS INSTALL OF SECTION 0-0-0 ON 07/02/2001 AT 19:29
*
---
> * BEGAN ATLAS INSTALL OF SECTION 0-0-0 ON 07/03/2001 AT 20:14
*
19c19
< Apparent peak=1061.83MFLOPS
---
> Apparent peak=1059.34MFLOPS
22c22
< Apparent peak=1059.31MFLOPS
---
> Apparent peak=1059.34MFLOPS
33c33
< This gave performance of 784.60 (73.8927777751420f
apparent peak)
---
> This gave performance of 776.12 (73.2627777751320f
apparent peak)
35c35
< Performance = 172.81 (22.03% of copy matmul, 16.27% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 805.24 (103.75% of copy matmul, 76.01% of
peak)
37c37
< Performance = 171.82 (21.90% of copy matmul, 16.18% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 832.74 (107.30% of copy matmul, 78.61% of
peak)
39c39
< Performance = 777.79 (99.13% of copy matmul, 73.25% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 772.77 (99.57% of copy matmul, 72.95% of
peak)
41c41
< Performance = 165.47 (21.09% of copy matmul, 15.58% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 834.04 (107.46% of copy matmul, 78.73% of
peak)
46c46
< CacheEdge set to 229376 bytes
---
> CacheEdge set to 172032 bytes
63c63
< Performance = 213.35 (27.19% of copy matmul, 20.09% of peak)
---
> Performance = 241.03 (31.06% of copy matmul, 22.75% of peak)
66c66
< Performance = 153.38 (19.55% of copy matmul, 14.44% of peak)
---
> Performance = 142.20 (18.32% of copy matmul, 13.42% of peak)
72c72
< Performance = 93.74 (11.95% of copy matmul, 8.83% of peak)
---
> Performance = 108.03 (13.92% of copy matmul, 10.20% of peak)
80c80
< This gave performance of 3208.61MFLOPS (302.9027777751420f apparent
peak)
---
> This gave performance of 2762.00MFLOPS (260.7327777751320f apparent
peak)
82c82
< Performance = 886.31 (27.62% of copy matmul, 83.67% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 910.50 (32.97% of copy matmul, 85.95% of
peak)
84c84
< Performance = 964.42 (30.06% of copy matmul, 91.04% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 966.28 (34.98% of copy matmul, 91.21% of
peak)
86c86
< Performance = 879.05 (27.40% of copy matmul, 82.98% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 883.50 (31.99% of copy matmul, 83.40% of
peak)
88c88
< Performance = 940.73 (29.32% of copy matmul, 88.81% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 942.51 (34.12% of copy matmul, 88.97% of
peak)
93c93
< CacheEdge set to 229376 bytes
---
> CacheEdge set to 172032 bytes
110c110
< Performance = 208.00 ( 6.48% of copy matmul, 19.64% of peak)
---
> Performance = 213.47 ( 7.73% of copy matmul, 20.15% of peak)
113c113
< Performance = 159.27 ( 4.96% of copy matmul, 15.04% of peak)
---
> Performance = 160.47 ( 5.81% of copy matmul, 15.15% of peak)
119c119
< Performance = 137.59 ( 4.29% of copy matmul, 12.99% of peak)
---
> Performance = 142.04 ( 5.14% of copy matmul, 13.41% of peak)
127c127
< This gave performance of 790.37 (74.4327777751420f
apparent peak)
---
> This gave performance of 801.53 (75.6627777751320f
apparent peak)
129c129
< Performance = 185.49 (23.47% of copy matmul, 17.47% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 800.42 (99.86% of copy matmul, 75.56% of
peak)
131c131
< Performance = 185.55 (23.48% of copy matmul, 17.47% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 845.87 (105.53% of copy matmul, 79.85% of
peak)
133c133
< Performance = 180.99 (22.90% of copy matmul, 17.05% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 835.36 (104.22% of copy matmul, 78.86% of
peak)
135c135
< Performance = 180.87 (22.88% of copy matmul, 17.03% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 840.58 (104.87% of copy matmul, 79.35% of
peak)
140c140
< CacheEdge set to 229376 bytes
---
> CacheEdge set to 172032 bytes
157c157
< Performance = 392.09 (49.61% of copy matmul, 36.93% of peak)
---
> Performance = 367.08 (45.80% of copy matmul, 34.65% of peak)
160c160
< Performance = 396.76 (50.20% of copy matmul, 37.37% of peak)
---
> Performance = 462.58 (57.71% of copy matmul, 43.67% of peak)
166c166
< Performance = 187.47 (23.72% of copy matmul, 17.66% of peak)
---
> Performance = 217.47 (27.13% of copy matmul, 20.53% of peak)
174c174
< This gave performance of 3476.51MFLOPS (328.1927777751420f apparent
peak)
---
> This gave performance of 2940.84MFLOPS (277.6127777751320f apparent
peak)
176c176
< Performance = 911.95 (26.23% of copy matmul, 86.09% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 915.07 (31.12% of copy matmul, 86.38% of
peak)
178c178
< Performance = 952.44 (27.40% of copy matmul, 89.91% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 957.56 (32.56% of copy matmul, 90.39% of
peak)
180c180
< Performance = 898.19 (25.84% of copy matmul, 84.79% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 892.24 (30.34% of copy matmul, 84.23% of
peak)
182c182
< Performance = 927.75 (26.69% of copy matmul, 87.58% of
peak)
---
> Performance = 929.34 (31.60% of copy matmul, 87.73% of
peak)
187c187
< CacheEdge set to 229376 bytes
---
> CacheEdge set to 172032 bytes
204c204
< Performance = 388.95 (11.19% of copy matmul, 36.72% of peak)
---
> Performance = 390.37 (13.27% of copy matmul, 36.85% of peak)
207c207
< Performance = 383.38 (11.03% of copy matmul, 36.19% of peak)
---
> Performance = 394.69 (13.42% of copy matmul, 37.26% of peak)
213c213
< Performance = 433.18 (12.46% of copy matmul, 40.89% of peak)
---
> Performance = 285.23 ( 9.70% of copy matmul, 26.93% of peak)
222c222
< * FINISHED ATLAS INSTALL OF SECTION 0-0-0 ON 07/02/2001 AT 20:43
*
---
> * FINISHED ATLAS INSTALL OF SECTION 0-0-0 ON 07/03/2001 AT 21:20
*
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, Chief Scientist, Borasky Research
http://www.borasky-research.net http://www.aracnet.com/~znmeb
mailto:znmeb@borasky-research.com mailto:znmeb@aracnet.com
Q: How do you get an elephant out of a theatre?
A: You can't. It's in their blood.